Chinmaya Keshari Sahoo, M Sudhakar, D Venkata Ramana, Kokkula Satyanarayana


Suppository quality control includes physical and chemical aspects of the product. Physical analysis includes visual examination (physical appearance), uniformity of weight,uniformity of texture, melting point, liquefaction time, melting and solidification time, and mechanical strength. Chemical testing includes analysis of the activity and dissolution testing.The uniformity of texture can be assessed by sectioning a suppository longitudinally and laterally, and ensuring that each section presents a smooth, uniform surface.

Keywords: Quality control, weight, melting point, liquefaction time

Full Text:



Lachman L. Lieberman AH et al. The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy CBS Publishers and Distributors. New Delhi. 2009; 564-588.

Boylan CJ. Swarbrick J et al. Encyclopedia of pharmaceutical technology. 2002; 1 (2): 932- 955.

Swamy PV, Ali M.U, Anandkumar Y et al. Design and evaluation of Rectal Drug Delivery Systems of Non-Steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. International Current Pharmaceutical Journal. 2012; 1 (7): 165-170.

Yousif HS et al. Formulation of Tinidazole Rectal Suppositories. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011; 10(2): 69-83.

Gowthamarajan K. Venketeshwaran G. Suresh B. et al. Formulation and Evaluation properties of Meloxicam Solid dispersion incorporated Suppositories. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. 2002; 2(4): 525-528.

Pushkar Baviskar P, Jaiswal SK , Sadique S , Landged A. Formulation and Evaluation of Lornoxicam Suppositories, The pharma innovation – journal 2013; 2(7):20-28.

Coben LJ, Lordi NG. Physical stability of semisynthetic suppository bases. J Pharm Sci.1980;69: 955–960.

Setnikar I, Fantelli S. Liquefaction time of rectal suppositories. J Pharm Sci. 1962; 51: 566–571.

Gold M, VePuri Murti Block LH.Suppository development and production. In: Lieberman HA Rieger MM Banker GS eds. Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Disperse Systems, New York Marcel Dekker 1996;2: 447–496.

Azhgikhin IS. Determination of the hardness of suppository bases using Kaminskii’s device. Aptechn Delo 1965; 14:14–19.

Gjellan K, Graffner C. Comparative dissolution studies of rectal formulations using the basket, the paddle and the flow-through methods. I. Paracetamol in suppositories and soft gelatin capsules of both hydrophilic and lipophilic types. Acta Pharm Nord 1989; 1: 343–354.

Furuno K, Gomita Y, Yoshida T, Oishi R, Saeki K,Araki Y. In vivo and in vitro release of indomethacin from water-soluble and fatty base suppositories. Acta Med Okayama 1992; 46: 223–231.

Schobel H, Klaus T, Raguse U, Pflegel P. The determination of the real dissolution rate of drug substances in melted suppository masses. Pharmazie 1988; 43: 650–651.

Janicki S, Sznitowska M, Zebrowska W, Gabiga H,Kupiec M. Evaluation of paracetamol suppositories by a pharmacopoeial dissolution test – comments on methodology. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2001; 52:249–254.

Nair L, Bhargava HN. Comparison of in vitro dissolution and permeation of fluconazole from different suppository bases. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1999; 25:691–694.

Koch HP, Klissenbauer C, Ritzinger A, Wallentin A. In vitro studies of drug liberation from suppositories with the rotating flask method. Pharmazie 1987;42:169–172.

Anon U.S. Pharmacopeia 30–National Formulary 25.Rockville, MD U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention 2007.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.