COMPARISON BETWEEN BIZYGOMATIC WIDTH AND NAIL SIZE AS A GUIDE IN TEETH SELECTION.

  • Keerthika S
Keywords: bizygomatic width, anterior teeth selection,ring finger, Index finger, measurements.

Abstract

Background: Esthetic appearance of the maxillary anterior teeth to large extent influences facial aesthetics .In case of partially or completely edentulous dentition or implant supported prosthesis determining length of the maxillary central incisors is quite challenging due to consideration of aesthetic factors such as available interocclusal space, amount of the tooth that should be visible and that which should not be.

Aim : Evaluation of correlation between bizygomatic width and nail size size as a guide in teeth selection.

Materials and methods : Twenty subjects were selected for the study. Measurement of cervical incisal height of maxillary central Incisors.Mesiodistal dimension of maxillary central Incisors was measured at its greatest diameter with divider and ruler.Length and width of maxillary central incisor assessed by using Berry’s and H pound formula for teeth selection was used as standard reference values.

Results: The mean of length of the Index finger length in 0.99 and index finger width is 0.95. The mean of length and width of ring finger is 1.02 and 1.05 respectively. Table 1 shows correlation between index finger nail width and mesiodistal dimension of maxillary central Incisors with p value (0.0479) which is statistically significant. Table 2 shows correlation between ring finger nail width and mesiodistal dimension of maxillary central Incisors with p value (0.6941) which is statistically insignificant.

Conclusion : In anthropometric system of teeth selection various anatomical entities such as  Maxillomandibular Relations, Contour of the Residual Ridge, Vertical distance Between the Ridges,lips etc which are used as guides to select  teeth ,finger nail size can also be used as a guide for teeth selection. Also variation in  correlation between nail size and bizygomatic width among various population can be assessed.From our point of view, to achieve high degree of accuracy , large sample size of participant from different ethnic group can be recruited into the study.

 

References

1) Karunakar Shetty1*, Mahesh Kumar1, Keerti Palagiri1, Susan Amanna, Facial Measurements as Predictors of the Length of the Maxillary Central Incisor in a Cross Section of the Indian Population - A Clinical Study, J Oral Hyg Health 2013, 1:1.
2) Hassel AJ, Nitschke I, Dreyhaupt J, Wegener I, Rammelsberg P, Hassel JC. Predicting tooth color from facial features and gender: Results from a white elderly cohort. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:101-6.
3) Sears VH. The selection and arrangement of artificial teeth. Dent Digest 1960;66:514-7.
4) House MM, Loop JL. Form and color in dental art (monograph). California: Whittier, MM House; 1939. p. 3-33.
5) Berry FH. Study of prosthetic art. Dentist Magazine 1905;12:405-9.
6) Sellen P, Phil B, Jagger D, Harrison A. Computer-generated study of the correlation between tooth, face, arch forms and palatal contour. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:163-68.
7) Condon M, Bready M, Quinn F. Maxillary anterior tooth dimensions and proportions in an Irish young adult population. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38(7):501-08.
8) Williams JL. A new classification of tooth forms with special reference to a new system of artificial teeth. New York: The Dentists’ Supply Co; 1914.
9) Mavroskoufis F, Ritchie GM. The face-form as a guide for the selection of maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:501-5.
10) Bell RA. The geometric theory of selection of artificial teeth: Is it valid? J Am Dent Assoc 1978;97 637-40.
11)celebic A, KneZovic- ziataricD(2003),A comparision of patient’s satisfaction between complete and removable partial denture wearers ,J Dent 31:445-451.

12)Naini FB,Gills DS,Facial Esthetics concept and canons.Dent update 2008 mar;35(2);102-104,106-107.

13)Saraswati P,The golden proportion and its application in human face.Eur J Anat 2007;11(3):177-180.

14) Gomes VL, Gonçalves LC, do Prado CJ, Junior IL, de Lima Lucas B. Correlation between facial measurements and themesiodistal width of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Esthet Restor
Dent 2006;18:196-205; discussion 205.

15) Ahmed Alsaadi*, Mohammed Mahdi and Ibrahim Almarzoo,Use of facial indicators for teeth selection, Adv Dent & Oral Health 1(2): ADOH.MS.ID.555556 (2015)-001.

16) Ayman Ellakwa, Kieran McNamara, Jasdeep Sandhu, Kedall James, The Journal Quantifying the Selection of Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Intraoral and Extraoral Anatomical Landmarks of Contemporary Dental Practice, November-December 2011;12(6):414-421
Published
2019-09-30
How to Cite
S, K. (2019). COMPARISON BETWEEN BIZYGOMATIC WIDTH AND NAIL SIZE AS A GUIDE IN TEETH SELECTION. Mintage Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Sciences (ISSN: 2320-3315), 17-19. Retrieved from http://mjpms.in/index.php/mjpms/article/view/485
Section
Original Article(s)